Saturday, 04.05.08
Barr None
Eric S. Lesser / Getty Images News
Had Bob Barr won his race for Georgia's Seventh Congressional District in 2002, it's easy to imagine him having stayed a fairly loyal Bush Republican. Though Barr had raised objections to the USA Patriot Act, he was never a dyed-in-the-wool dissenter in the vein of Rep. Ron Paul. Since leaving office, however, Barr has been radicalized by what he sees as the erosion of our civil liberties. Once known for his zealous opposition to medical marijuana, he has reversed his old stand on the Drug War, and he is almost as passionate in damning the invasion of Iraq as Paul himself. Can Barr become the Ralph Nader of 2008 -- spoiling the election for Republican conservatives, or perhaps for anti-war Democrats? Almost certainly not. All the same, this year's most interesting presidential debate will likely happen within Bob Barr's Libertarian Party.
Though the left has the money and the momentum, the fragmentation of the political right is entering a new and fascinating phase. Long-suppressed populist and nationalist currents reemerged in 2006, shaping the backlash against immigration reform as well as the Democratic campaigns of Jim Webb and the failed congressional candidate Paul Hackett. In this year's GOP primaries, both Paul and Mike Huckabee mobilized small yet passionate constituencies eager to build an alternative to movement conservatism as we know it. In Paul's case, this populist and nationalist anger was tied to an idiosyncratic libertarianism founded in constitutional principle. Some Paulites claimed to be returning to the Republican Party's Reaganite roots. But of course they were in fact advocating a return to the verities of Robert Taft's day, and to the scrupulously independent foreign policy of George Washington's Farewell Address. Is there any future in this brand of politics? Hundreds of thousands of youthful activists seem to think so. If Barr can keep them energized, he may well change the face of national politics for years to come.
Meanwhile, Mike Gravel, the erstwhile Democratic presidential candidate, has also thrown his hat into the ring for the Libertarian nomination. For all his strident anti-imperialism, Gravel never developed a real constituency on the left. But his politics offer an intriguing way forward for Libertarians. His plan for overhauling the welfare state, devised by the far-from-insane Boston University economist Laurence Kotlikoff, promises to put entitlements on a sound footing and deliver healthcare to all Americans, all while sparking an investment-led economic boom. This isn't the kind of platform that normally appeals to flinty individualists, but the case can be made that the plan is in some important sense freedom-friendly. Provided you found the right messenger -- namely, someone slightly less loopy than Gravel -- it might even resonate with the public.
Li-Barr-tarianDave Weigel has been following Bob Barr's emergence as a leading Libertarian for years, most recently in this post. |
No more Obamacons?Daniel McCarthy fears that a Barr candidacy might deliver the White House to McCain. |
Barr the door!Dana Milbank chronicled Bob Barr's profound unpopularity at CPAC in 2006 |
Barr-barian raidTim Noah called for "a Republican Nader" in 2004. |
(5)
Yup, this November it will either beBarr for me or Ron Paul as a write in- screw McCain, Limbaugh and the rest of the "party". However, McCain only has about 600 secured delegates and at county and state conventions across the country us Paul delegates are getting elected. Gee...it would be just terrible for McCain if there were a bunch of us Paul hooligans at the national convention.
Forget McCain, Obama, and Hillary. The most compelling and interesting candidates this cycle (post primary) are Paul, Gravel, and Barr.
Cheers,
John H. Huckans, Ph.D.
Gravel is a solid candidate with a track record of doing the right thing for the American people, regardless of the political risk.
Loopy would be voting in yet another "Republican" that wants to further the corporate welfare state while creating more terrorists abroad. Loopy would be voting in a Democrat that thinks universal health care means forcing people to pay for it.
Running to win !
BARR-GRAVEL
just sounds GREAT in 2008.
www.BobBarr2008.com
=/> 270 EC Votes...
Time to get on board...


This article exemplifies how Republicans lost me: They feel that they are the rightful owners of my vote and that I have stolen their property if I should vote for another.
Posted by Carol | April 5, 2008 2:07 PM