John McCain

Last week, the Bradley Project on America's National Identity released a report, entitled E Pluribus Unum, warning of "mounting confusion about the meaning of American national identity and a loss of commitment to its promotion."

The Bradley report, which draws on public opinion data and conversations with dozens of academics, scholars and journalists (full disclosure: I attended one such meeting), argues that Americans' sense of national identity is weakening, and that the American leadership class ought to do something about it. Citing declining civic and historical literacy, an education system that emphasizes ethnic identities over a shared Americanism, and a rising emphasis on "global citizenship" rather than national loyalty among the nation's political and business elites, the report offers a list of recommendations ranging from the broad ("a renewed focus on the teaching of American history" in America's schools, say, or a new "initiative to ensure immigrants learn English, understand democratic institutions, and participate fully in the American way of life") to the highly specific (the return of ROTC to elite universities; the creation of an annual Presidential medal to reward "commitment to American ideals and institutions").

John McCain sketched out a nuclear security agenda that represents a dramatic break with the Bush White House.

Covering McCain’s Tuesday speech on nuclear security policy, Elisabeth Bumiller reported in the New York Times that the Republican presidential nominee “distanced himself from the Bush administration.” Lefty bloggers, meanwhile, whined that many of McCain’s proposals were “right out of George W. Bush’s play book.” But the proper point of reference for McCain’s speech—and the best guide to his likely behavior in office—is his own record on nonproliferation policy, not Bush’s. MORE

John McCain delivered a speech on his judicial philosophy on Tuesday.

It's no surprise that liberals hated John McCain's speech on the judiciary on Tuesday, while conservatives (mostly) liked it. But it's disappointing that the speech didn't break any new ground in the debate over judicial nominations. McCain can be refreshingly clear when it comes to subjects that our political debate tends to constrict. Not this time.

While his Democratic rivals continued their battle, John McCain spent last week on a tour of America's "forgotten places" - most of them Democratic strongholds.

Was McCain's tour, which took him to Selma and Appalachia, the Ninth Ward of New Orleans and Youngstown, Ohio, a serious play for constituencies (the working poor, black and white alike) that go reliably for Democrats? Was it a cynical attempt to woo white suburbanites by burnishing his image as a different kind of conservative? Or was it just another play for free publicity - like his "biography tour" earlier in April - by a campaign that's short on funds and looking for ways to get the media to stop obsessing over Obama-Hillary long enough to give their candidate some airtime?